The only way a country "wins" at SI in a meaningful way is if they use the SI to immediately kill everyone else.
Otherwise all the other countries will also get SI, just slightly later, in which case there is not really that much benefit to being the "winner" who got there first.
With this in mind, I don't want anyone to "win" at SI and anyone who does is probably a sociopath or worse.
quite humiliating to change vocabulary just because an old man said so
> SI
You just love to bend the knee that easily? Why?
what does SI stand for, subordinate imbecile?
Super Intelligence.
The only way a country "wins" at SI in a meaningful way is if they use the SI to immediately kill everyone else.
Otherwise all the other countries will also get SI, just slightly later, in which case there is not really that much benefit to being the "winner" who got there first.
With this in mind, I don't want anyone to "win" at SI and anyone who does is probably a sociopath or worse.
Not necessarily kill, just stop further AI development.
> Not necessarily kill, just stop further AI development.
But then this would be considered an act of war, so then the killing starts.