My comparison of its reasoning efforts[0] seems to show that it only really supports 3 modes: none, low, xhigh.
Low and medium are basically the same.
Also, the electricity it costs to run on a 3090 is not negligible, so that it's cheaper to use Luna high via API than Qwen 3.8 27b locally, hardware costs excluding.
[0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/qwen-qwen3-8-27b-high/qwen-qwen...
$0.286/kWh is a ridiculous amount of money to pay for power. That's more than double the regional residental average here!
If I ever found myself in this situation I would much rather just rent cards from hotasile and run open models instead of giving OAI money and playing reset bingo
Ridiculous? Wow. I'm paying ~$0.4/kWh in western Europe...
Paying around ~$0.25-0.3 per kWh here in South Africa. But you can also put up a lot of solar panels and lower that effectively.
The current spot price in northern Europe is 0.025€/kWh, yesterday it was 0.007€/kWh :D
Can be easily the price you will pay across Australia, depending on the time of day.
I removed the extra links to sources for the electricity prices, but that's the average cost in EU, where I live.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/d...
it is not the marginal price for household users, but the (average electricity bill : subscription + consumption) / (average consumption), so it will be higher than the additional kwh consumed.
Maybe, but only it's marginally off.
This is what I pay extra per kWh,in Netherlands: € 0,25162 ($0.291), excluding the connection costs.
Indeed, EPEX spot prices are between €0.30 and €0.39 today including taxes where I live. I've seen them go up to €1.10 during peak demand.
Also, note that the Luna was run and costs were calculated through OpenRouter, via API. With a ChatGPT subscription it's likely even cheaper.
Also, Qwen 3.7 27B is actually Terra level.
Welcome to Europe
Btw, unrelated, but this is the kind of Vibe Coded AI slop design I see a lot these days. Every single thing on this page has a different color, formatting, and it's just painful to look at.
Thanks for the feedback!
That might be my fault, I am not a designer, and I asked for most UI decisions.
I tried to use colors to diferentiate models, the site is very data dense and it's hard to make everything readable.
I've spent hundreds of hours building it, not sure if I would call it slop, but I just suck at design, lol
Any suggestions on how to improve it?
How about a complete rewrite that is not vibe coded? I'm only half serious. You're likely to use an LLM to help develop it, but don't let it take you for a ride. LLM's really struggle with data dense and robust designs.
Have a look at https://diskprices.com/ - this is great UX because it's extremely functional, yet it has nearly no design to speak of. On a scale of data dense designs, this one would be on the extreme side, so I guess if you ask the LLM to meet you somewhere in the middle.
I am still pretty happy with some UX decisions I took:
- the spotlight search, you can do ctrl+k and search "gpt vs claude vs google" and it automatically shows the most relevant comparison
- drag to reorder compared models
- filter leaderboard by multiple comma separated needles, so you can see for example all qwen and kimi models only
- the showcases page is quite cool
A lot of invisible UI/UX features are there, which I think work great, only the visual presentation could be, as you mentioned, a lot better.
Fair enough. I'll check it out in the next few weeks to see how the site evolves.
I do try to guide it, I don't think strictly telling LLMs what to do works best. I like letting the LLM do what it thinks it's best (supposedly it is a lot smarter than me), and then guide it in the directions I think it should go and fix the flaws I notice.
I checked out that link on mobile, but it's unfortunately unusable. I will check it out later on desktop, thank you.