Btw, unrelated, but this is the kind of Vibe Coded AI slop design I see a lot these days. Every single thing on this page has a different color, formatting, and it's just painful to look at.

Thanks for the feedback!

That might be my fault, I am not a designer, and I asked for most UI decisions.

I tried to use colors to diferentiate models, the site is very data dense and it's hard to make everything readable.

I've spent hundreds of hours building it, not sure if I would call it slop, but I just suck at design, lol

Any suggestions on how to improve it?

How about a complete rewrite that is not vibe coded? I'm only half serious. You're likely to use an LLM to help develop it, but don't let it take you for a ride. LLM's really struggle with data dense and robust designs.

Have a look at https://diskprices.com/ - this is great UX because it's extremely functional, yet it has nearly no design to speak of. On a scale of data dense designs, this one would be on the extreme side, so I guess if you ask the LLM to meet you somewhere in the middle.

I am still pretty happy with some UX decisions I took:

- the spotlight search, you can do ctrl+k and search "gpt vs claude vs google" and it automatically shows the most relevant comparison

- drag to reorder compared models

- filter leaderboard by multiple comma separated needles, so you can see for example all qwen and kimi models only

- the showcases page is quite cool

A lot of invisible UI/UX features are there, which I think work great, only the visual presentation could be, as you mentioned, a lot better.

Fair enough. I'll check it out in the next few weeks to see how the site evolves.

I do try to guide it, I don't think strictly telling LLMs what to do works best. I like letting the LLM do what it thinks it's best (supposedly it is a lot smarter than me), and then guide it in the directions I think it should go and fix the flaws I notice.

I checked out that link on mobile, but it's unfortunately unusable. I will check it out later on desktop, thank you.