Nothing you say is necessarily wrong or bad, but it is why we can’t have beautiful things and only utilitarian shit.

Some things should be a utility. Nice is important but transit should fade into the background while you live life. Don't make them ugly but utility needs to be first.

Well, some people spend a significant amount of their time on transit. Of course, utility should come first, but I also would totally support trying to make them look nice (even if most people wouldn't notice nowadays because they stare at their phones the whole time).

Utilitarians see the utility of everything and the value of nothing.

You can have lots of beautiful things. You can't REQUIRE beautiful things. Government services are a requirement.

Thinking like this is exactly what's wrong with public transport in most of the world. It has to be there, but god forbid you make it actually attractive, then people might use it more and it would cost even more. Better to keep it at a barely tolerable level and save the money for what really matters, like road projects.

You can't REQUIRE beautiful things.

Sure you can.

At least in the United States, there are many state and local laws requiring a certain percentage of the money spent on building projects be dedicated to making them look good, and to putting art inside them.

One example of many: https://sfca.hawaii.gov/art-in-public-places-program/percent...

Usually it's public projects, but often it's both public and private construction.