Not GP. Probably less dependencies on github, e.g. actions which sometimes don't work. This way github is a "dumb backup".
I selfhost forgejo (gitea fork) on home sever (nuc), similar setup with tailscale. I was planning to setup git mirror on a remote VM for backup, but since I am the only one using it and have everything on dev laptop and remote backups of nuc server I didn't bother to do that (I know I still should).
> This way github is a "dumb backup"
Eh? What GH department do you work in anyways? Training Data Sustainability?
I don't understand your question. If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
edit: If you think I sound like an LLM, I guess that is what happens when most of your interactions in English language are with LLMs.
Given the state of it, you might well ...
I missed the opportunity to add "you are absolutely right".
> If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
Why not. But you are saying github as a dumb backup makes sense when you do self-hosting. I don't think you really believe that.
GH as a backup and a downstream public mirror for a self-hosted gitea or similar is entirely purposful. None of your comments have made any sense.
Yeah I should've asked why they are self-hosting in the first place. I was wrong in assuming that they wanted to host it themselves (that is, avoiding an external dependency).