> This way github is a "dumb backup"
Eh? What GH department do you work in anyways? Training Data Sustainability?
I don't understand your question. If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
edit: If you think I sound like an LLM, I guess that is what happens when most of your interactions in English language are with LLMs.
Given the state of it, you might well ...
I missed the opportunity to add "you are absolutely right".
> If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
Why not. But you are saying github as a dumb backup makes sense when you do self-hosting. I don't think you really believe that.
GH as a backup and a downstream public mirror for a self-hosted gitea or similar is entirely purposful. None of your comments have made any sense.
Yeah I should've asked why they are self-hosting in the first place. I was wrong in assuming that they wanted to host it themselves (that is, avoiding an external dependency).
I don't understand your question. If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
edit: If you think I sound like an LLM, I guess that is what happens when most of your interactions in English language are with LLMs.
Given the state of it, you might well ...
I missed the opportunity to add "you are absolutely right".
> If I was working for GH would I be selfhosting forgejo?
Why not. But you are saying github as a dumb backup makes sense when you do self-hosting. I don't think you really believe that.
GH as a backup and a downstream public mirror for a self-hosted gitea or similar is entirely purposful. None of your comments have made any sense.
Yeah I should've asked why they are self-hosting in the first place. I was wrong in assuming that they wanted to host it themselves (that is, avoiding an external dependency).