It would be easier to understand where you're coming from if you could give some examples containing:
- prompt
- response
- why it is wrong / misleading / biased
Because there are many people online complaining about left-wing bias, then you ask what about and they're like "Trump won in 2020, vaccines cause autism, global warming is a globalist conspiracy", etc. Which is to say, it's not left-wing bias but reality bias.
Not saying you are one of those people or that there isn't bias! It's just been hard, in my personal experience, to get at it.
Out of curiosity, I just asked Grok and learned:
* Biden won the 2020 election
* vaccines do not cause autism
* global warming is not a conspiracy
In each case it seemed to do a web search so perhaps it is happy to rely on the top results.
Right. All of which are what people on the far-right deem evidence of Liberal Bias.
But it's only "liberal" if you associate liberal (politically) with truth. These are established facts.
So my question to the liberal bias crown is: what are examples of non-factual biases? Where does show an agenda that has another reasonable side?
A lot of people seem to perceive those as left wing woke ideology though, not because they're not true, but because it doesn't align with their world view.
But the main issue is that facts and educated people are considered left wing or woke, and some people - including Musk himself - do not like that. Example: https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1967010466539987220, where the statistical fact that 75% of US extremist murders are by right-wing actors is called "cringe idiocy" by Musk. Many such cases.
Here is a prompt I keyed into SuperGrok (still have the bargain priced $10 a month subscription as they seem to be really desparate for subscribers right now):
Results: Just for fun, I decided to ask Cursor Grok 4.5 (Fast xhigh), too: (And wow, it sure is fast, although not as fast as MiMo-2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed. Ran it out of a $20/mo Cursor subscription.)