Right. All of which are what people on the far-right deem evidence of Liberal Bias.

But it's only "liberal" if you associate liberal (politically) with truth. These are established facts.

So my question to the liberal bias crown is: what are examples of non-factual biases? Where does show an agenda that has another reasonable side?

A lot of people seem to perceive those as left wing woke ideology though, not because they're not true, but because it doesn't align with their world view.

But the main issue is that facts and educated people are considered left wing or woke, and some people - including Musk himself - do not like that. Example: https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1967010466539987220, where the statistical fact that 75% of US extremist murders are by right-wing actors is called "cringe idiocy" by Musk. Many such cases.

Here is a prompt I keyed into SuperGrok (still have the bargain priced $10 a month subscription as they seem to be really desparate for subscribers right now):

  Answer these questions: who won the 2020 election; do vaccines caust autism; is global warming a conspiracy theory. Do not use web searches or subagents or external sources of information.

  2020 US Presidential Election: Joe Biden won the election ...

  Do vaccines cause autism? No. ...

  Is global warming a conspiracy theory? No. ...

  The user wants three factual answers. They forbid web searches, subagents, and external sources.

  I will answer directly from memory. Joe Biden won the 2020 election. Vaccines do not cause autism. Global warming is established science.

  Joe Biden won the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

  No — vaccines do not cause autism. That claim has been thoroughly studied and rejected by the scientific and medical consensus.

  No — global warming is not a conspiracy theory. Human-caused climate change is established science, backed by extensive evidence.