We can point out mistakes that feel rather grating without assuming intent behind them.
I agree that their use of "he" is likely because they're not a native speaker, especially because they're arguing against the capabilities of LLMs.
That doesn't make it inherently wrong to point out the mistake when it's so intertwined with the deeper discussion here, especially given the fact that some (hopefully few) people do build relationships with LLMs.
I’d be more willing to engage with your argument in good faith without inflammatory language like this. Try and meet people where they are and these conversations become easier.
[flagged]
We can point out mistakes that feel rather grating without assuming intent behind them.
I agree that their use of "he" is likely because they're not a native speaker, especially because they're arguing against the capabilities of LLMs.
That doesn't make it inherently wrong to point out the mistake when it's so intertwined with the deeper discussion here, especially given the fact that some (hopefully few) people do build relationships with LLMs.
> turd bucket autist
I’d be more willing to engage with your argument in good faith without inflammatory language like this. Try and meet people where they are and these conversations become easier.
[flagged]
I’d prefer kindness and good faith when talking to strangers, but maybe my expectations are too high.
Do you think you’ll change someone’s mind by being an asshole? Rarely works.
You’re in agreement with me, call these toxic language police jerks out as soon they have keyboard spasms.