It's worth flagging that the homepage and the docs are both nearly unreadable on mobile. If you're going to have cheeky rhetoric like "no crumbs" please take the time to actually test the pages your LLM made for you in a bunch of different ways.
It's worth flagging that the homepage and the docs are both nearly unreadable on mobile. If you're going to have cheeky rhetoric like "no crumbs" please take the time to actually test the pages your LLM made for you in a bunch of different ways.
Reads fine for me. I’m getting a bit worn out with the number of ‘if you’re going to use an LLM then take the time to …’ posts. I’ve looked at plenty of HN submissions that don’t render at all on mobile and yes I found it frustrating but didn’t just attribute it to an LLM.
Check the cards that are wrapped, along with the footer
They're nearly unreadable on desktop, too. The prose is incomprehensibly jargon-heavy, I literally have no idea what it's talking about.
I feel the same. I have no idea what “CDP” and “WAF” means in this context.
I feel awkward about all this probably-LLM-generated prose that does not respect me enough as a reader to explain acronyms and give context.
hate to tag along on this take but i agree
"...browser automation framework..." was about all i understood
and even then it had me guessing if it was talking about an alternative e2e testing framework like cypress, selenium, playwright.....and somehow I was right lmao (i think?)
but literally all the other jargon there had me stumped. I'm still afraid to google
Likewise, the text does come across to me as LLM heavy (with a spice of pizzazz), but even as a dev who uses playwright I doubt I would change after seeing this.To OP: not convincing enough.
Maybe this is targeted towards super users who are deep in the weeds of various browser automation framework internals.
A better marketing approach towards someone like me who just uses this to test my apps e2e and be done with it, would be to have simple cliches like:
I might call bs on that, but I'd be more likely to try it out.bruh
llm recommends using a desktop to view the site as typically that's also the form factor required to use the tool!
Not true. One could be running a container on Android or iOS, accessing a machine remotely, or any number of other things. Best not to assume.