Not sure if this was written with AI assistance of not, but I've become allergic to linguistic triples as LLMs use them so much, reading "Same code. Same input. Different answer" makes me not want to read the rest.
Not sure if this was written with AI assistance of not, but I've become allergic to linguistic triples as LLMs use them so much, reading "Same code. Same input. Different answer" makes me not want to read the rest.
It's clearly AI written as are quite a few of the posts on the front-page now.
We seem to have lost the war for people to find their own voice, the AI articles are getting widely upvoted, and people pointing out they are AI are no longer getting traction, people don't seem to care.
Its weird that almost every AI generated blurb tends to have that. Usually followed by "Its not just X, its Y". I wonder where they picked that up from.
It sounds authoritative so people would respond positively to it when presented with it during training.
My guess is LinkedIn posts and YouTube transcriptions. I notice the pattern almost exclusively being used there.
a tricolon crescens ^^ https://latinaadvitam.blogspot.com/2007/02/poetry-device-of-...
I think the problem is the mismatch between the intended evocative tone of tricolon crescens and the triviality of a 'computer quirk' in the grand scheme of things. "Use figures of speech, but don't sling them around like monkey shit" - my literature teacher.
Same. I now tend to simply abandon writing when I see those tell tale signs
Yeah, they often call this to mind: "Better ingredients. Better pizza. Papa John's."
I also got turned off after the very first paragraph. Too bad, because the content itself might be fine, but the AI language has become repulsive.