They only look like meat to blend in. It's the only way to figure out if they're made out of meat.

> They only look like meat to blend in. It's the only way to figure out if they're made out of meat.

Perhaps the makers of the movie neglected to read the story before creating a script?

In the story, the very idea of permanently meat-based beings appals them, and in fact one of them doesn't entirely believe it. So why would they look like meat to "blend in", a priori, if one of them doesn't even fathom the idea? "Blend in" with what? One of them doesn't believe what it's dealing with!

Like a sibling comment mentions, they talk about "meat sounds"... using meat sounds! Why would they find it surprising if that's how they are communicating in the short film? They are not depicted as communicating via telepathy or whatever.

(Yes, I understand the limitations of low budget shorts. But it doesn't mean it has to work...)

> So why would they look like meat to "blend in", a priori, if one of them doesn't even fathom the idea?

I'd imagine British spies in WWII sometimes wore swastikas to blend in?

They infiltrating to investigate. It needn't be an endorsement of the practice.

Well, if you think you can do a better job, make it happen. Make the film you want to see.

Why? Surely one can criticize a movie, book, videogame, etc, without being required to create a better one in turn.

I didn't hate it, and I always appreciate the charm of low budget productions. I'm just saying this particular adaptation doesn't work for me, and trying to explain why.

One low budget feature-length film about aliens I quite liked (though it obviously has a higher budget, and of course its own set of flaws; and to be clear I'm not arguing both productions are in the same ballpark!) is "The Vast of Night" [1]. I quite liked the actors and the directorial choices.

---

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6803046/