> Thiel is on the record in many ways that would justify the GPs statement.
Thiel is on the record saying he would use the data to make health and security worse? On the record saying he would abuse access? AFAICT this is not true.
> Thiel is on the record in many ways that would justify the GPs statement.
Thiel is on the record saying he would use the data to make health and security worse? On the record saying he would abuse access? AFAICT this is not true.
I'll just give you one, and you can google for others:
"I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible."
For a guy with his access to data, yes, that makes everybody's security worse.
This is an incomplete quote from a pro-freedom essay: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/educatio...
Edit: Also, that quote does not provide evidence that he is "on the record" saying he would abuse access or make health or security worse.
That "essay" is only 14 paragraphs. It is pro freedom on the surface, but that just adds weight to the overall message that he is anti democracy. That he believes we'll find more freedom by abondoning democracy and moving to some other system doesn't reassure me of his sanity.
You fail at reading comprehension. That's fine, but don't do it here. Thank you.