This is an incomplete quote from a pro-freedom essay: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/educatio...
Edit: Also, that quote does not provide evidence that he is "on the record" saying he would abuse access or make health or security worse.
That "essay" is only 14 paragraphs. It is pro freedom on the surface, but that just adds weight to the overall message that he is anti democracy. That he believes we'll find more freedom by abondoning democracy and moving to some other system doesn't reassure me of his sanity.
You fail at reading comprehension. That's fine, but don't do it here. Thank you.