> As far as German law was concerned, ordering the deaths of millions of people wasn't a crime because of uniquely awful German law dehumanizing those people.
As far as American law is concerned, causing the deaths of many people isn’t a crime because of uniquely awful regulatory regime dehumanizing those people.
> Also: stop comparing things to the Holocaust.
It illustrates well the point that “just because a killing is lawful doesn’t necessarily mean it shouldn’t be considered murder”.
Because you're intent on framing a policy decision you dislike as "murder" you've found yourself arguing that running a death camp wouldn't be prosecutable without a "crimes against humanity" law, and comparing the administration of health care systems to the Holocaust. This is what I mean by saying you've twisted yourself into a pretzel. You made a bad argument. It's not the end of the world; I do it all the time. Let it go.
> you've found yourself arguing that running a death camp wouldn't be prosecutable without a "crimes against humanity" law
I have cited how we did, indeed, have to do exactly that.
> comparing the administration of health care systems to the Holocaust
Yes. Both involve causing megadeaths in a way existing law is entirely unprepared for.