I've been trying to understand the logic of this comment for the last five minutes, but genuinely the only explanation I can come up with is that it's satire.
I've been trying to understand the logic of this comment for the last five minutes, but genuinely the only explanation I can come up with is that it's satire.
They alleged that Michigan makes it difficult to get an ID for voter suppression purposes, but ID is not required to vote in Michigan. Which leads me to suspect that the user in question is making up their talking points out of thin air.
At no point did they imply that Michigan currently requires voter ID. Arainach gave you an example of disparity in ease of voting.
As a separate point, they preemptively mention that a similar disparity exists re/ getting an ID, which is what you're trying to add as a requirement. It's a straightforward argument.
So where do you get "that Michigan makes it difficult to get an ID for voter suppression purposes"?