You seem to be reading too hard into what I said. I wasn't giving you an exhaustive list of where the snark lies. I was saying where it started.
Edit: From your reply of "Great work? Do you want a cert to prove how well you perform the function of forum peanut gallery?" it looks like you have abandoned the claim I was being suspiciously selective. Good! We're settled then. I'm going to ignore your weird new goalpost where you get annoyed that someone clarified themselves.
> Believe it or not
> which I’m sure surprises you
You caused the problem here. You started off being hazy and rude.
"Say that again without trying to dunk on anyone if you want me to put effort into responding." seems like a pretty reasonable trade.
[flagged]
My ability to recognize snark is not carrying water for anyone. It started with your very first comment.
Your ability to recognize snark is suspiciously selective too.
Weird.
You seem to be reading too hard into what I said. I wasn't giving you an exhaustive list of where the snark lies. I was saying where it started.
Edit: From your reply of "Great work? Do you want a cert to prove how well you perform the function of forum peanut gallery?" it looks like you have abandoned the claim I was being suspiciously selective. Good! We're settled then. I'm going to ignore your weird new goalpost where you get annoyed that someone clarified themselves.
[flagged]