> Architecture and what to avoid are also strengths of AI.

Absolutely not at all. Every single day that I work with Claude, there is abundant evidence that AI sucks at these. Ask me for examples if you need them.

Yes, please provide examples.

See these comments of mine, which I added exactly for cases like these where someone asks for evidence:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50220976

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50165791

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50159827

The first links shows a basic failure of reasoning, which would have gone unnoticed if I was just vibe-coding.

The second link shows weak architectural sense and an inability to see the big picture.

The last link in particular is telling: the agents worked with me (over weeks to months) to implement a db abstraction layer without ever bringing up the fact that as it stands, that would have never worked with any indexes at all. I did not constrain them to my choices, but they never stopped me with that design. It took my eagle-eyed attention to their offhand comments to notice this problem, which then required a lot of rework to fix.

Unfortunately, all three comments have apparently been flagged by somebody for some reason and I can't read them. This is my least favorite aspect of hacker news. It's exhausting, honestly.

Like a sibling comment replied, you can set "showdead" to "yes" on your profile and click update" so see flagged comments. Not sure why they were flagged.

I have read that comments which appear to have been written by an LLM are auto-filtered. As these appear to mostly consist of quotations of LLM output, I expect this would be why.

I suggest putting them on a blog or something and linking to that, rather than HN comments.

Go to your profile, and you can set a flag 'showdead' as = yes. Then you'll be able to see flagged/dead comments.

For flagged threads, you can go to:

https://news.ycombinator.com/active

[deleted]