I'm not the person to whom you asked this question, but it seems redundant considering that their post literally contained this critique:
> a poorly configured Arch Linux install with some rather crappy bash scripts on top.
I'm not the person to whom you asked this question, but it seems redundant considering that their post literally contained this critique:
> a poorly configured Arch Linux install with some rather crappy bash scripts on top.
Sure, but arch notoriously is very small, I'm not sure how you can really configure it that poorly at the install level.
What makes the bash scripts crappy, etc?
I asked what it's good at, too, didn't literally contain that critique.