>> My vibe coded apps tend to over sanitize inputs. Not sure what was the point of blaming LLMs.
> LLMs weren’t blamed … If you don’t know what you are doing any tool can be dangerous
If we're not talking about LLMs but instead about humans (who might be coding by hand, or from stackoverflow, or who might be using an LLM regardless of whether it frequently sanitizes by default), then shouldn't the original comment have more accurately referred to humans, as vibe-coding specifically refers to LLM use, right?
Did you mean to reply to my comment? Was your issue with the original claim that lack of sanitization *"required"* "vibe-coded" functionality, or with the counterclaim that lack of sanitization can and has occurred even for code that is 0% related to vibe-coding or LLMs (let alone "requiring" vibe-coding for it to occur)?
LLMs weren’t blamed, vibe coders were blamed.
If you don’t know what you are doing any tool can be dangerous
>>> vibe-coded
>> My vibe coded apps tend to over sanitize inputs. Not sure what was the point of blaming LLMs.
> LLMs weren’t blamed … If you don’t know what you are doing any tool can be dangerous
If we're not talking about LLMs but instead about humans (who might be coding by hand, or from stackoverflow, or who might be using an LLM regardless of whether it frequently sanitizes by default), then shouldn't the original comment have more accurately referred to humans, as vibe-coding specifically refers to LLM use, right?
Does this even remotely matter? What’s the issue here?
Did you mean to reply to my comment? Was your issue with the original claim that lack of sanitization *"required"* "vibe-coded" functionality, or with the counterclaim that lack of sanitization can and has occurred even for code that is 0% related to vibe-coding or LLMs (let alone "requiring" vibe-coding for it to occur)?