There is no interesting interpretation, beyond e.g...

If you ask all these models "Four score and seven what?" They'll all say the same thing. There's essentially no difference here.

This confidence is baffling

How do you know?

Why do you suspect otherwise?

This is part of why I find this type of inquiry unhelpful. It's just dueling unsupported assertions of what the LLM is "really thinking"

Consider the following task: "Download and install every top 50 distro from distrowatch.com, open the terminal and type in the command 'ls /'"

I can describe to you with overwhelming confidence about what you're likely to see as the result (folders, like bin etc lib usr etc) even if the details may be a little off, or one or two of them does something weird.

Same thing here?