> but luckily we have an entire process for dealing with this
and why does this "peer-review" new-age thing cannot be used to scrutinize AI-writted/AI-assisted papers?
> but luckily we have an entire process for dealing with this
and why does this "peer-review" new-age thing cannot be used to scrutinize AI-writted/AI-assisted papers?
a) because the AI is not able to write papers in a manner digestible by humans? b) perhaps because AI generates papers whose complexity is beyond what a human brain can grasp?
Aaaa, you mean 'peer-review' by AI?
Then the answer is: What is the use of a paper no human understands? Then no human can see that the techniques from the paper can be used to build something useful for real human life.
OK, ok, AI can decide to use those techniques to do something in real life it considers useful.
Are you now getting scared? Why not?