> The dispute turns crucially on how available exploits were during the embargo period.

I sure hope thats not true.

All signs indicate that writing a self-replicating exploit that'd flood the internet without warning is possible. All we know is that nobody did.

A lot of websites - especially the ones who made the call to go down first like government / healthcare - do not have the luxury of taking any risk.

Writing this blog post with the "hindsight" of no exploit going viral for several hours after the patches is - let me be frank - complete bullshit; and i dont want this person anywhere near an important system.

If by next _year_ nobody has proven a successful consistent hack, then we can start to doubt the videos. If there is, then all of this has been warranted.