because the tools can't? Lol. That's not how it works. Am I in the twilight zone?

All this anthropomorphism of literal statistical text generators.

Yes they exhibit generated sentences of text that describe coherent responses about a topic when there's an inordinate amount of research material in the training data from which they are distilling sentences of sound and rational thought. That's the ONLY way it can possibly work. There are so many scenarios where the training data isn't setup like that and low and behold the generated responses are just literal garbage.

Honestly this is starting to feel like a "God in the gaps" argument.

how so?