There’s an overlap, but the observation from the parent comment turns this widely cited phenomenon from a supposed mystery or deep insight into something trivial.
It’s like observing that humans across cultures agree that the word “woof” refers to a dog and the word “miaw” refers to a cat… no shit.
I hope you understand that just because a proposed explanations makes intuitive sense, it doesn't automatically have to be right.
I don't think the insight is trivial, but to each their own I suppose.