Wouldn't it be ironic if, after all this, it was discovered that the most economical way of producing some fundamental 'unit of intelligence' was to feed/clothe/entertain a human?
Wouldn't it be ironic if, after all this, it was discovered that the most economical way of producing some fundamental 'unit of intelligence' was to feed/clothe/entertain a human?
This is the very core of my issue with "AI". From a resource usage point of view, it cannot hope to compete with a developer armed with a banana.
Ook.
You can always put the brain in a jar: https://corticallabs.com/cl1.html
Isn't that the premise of The Matrix?
Bar "clothing", I guess.
It would be. But that's not going to happen.
No, that is just equilibrium economics.
Machines are cheaper than humans? Buy more machines.
Humans are cheaper than machines? Hire more humans.