The kind of bug that can be fixed by overwriting instructions with NOPs is trivial. The OP isn't trying to invalidate Microsoft's SDLC & QA. They just wanted a solution.
The kind of bug that can be fixed by overwriting instructions with NOPs is trivial. The OP isn't trying to invalidate Microsoft's SDLC & QA. They just wanted a solution.
Who says inserting those NOPs didn't break other behaviour that OP isn't using. And then there's also Hyrum's law. This whole thing could be very non-trivial.
Fixing a bug for everyone is very different from fixing the bug just for yourself