Go talk to an artist, and they'll tell you art is a form of engineering, and it requires the artist to understand what works, what doesn't, and why, in practical & scientific terms. The corporate world is dogmatic, self-destructive, FOMO-obsessed and then some. It considers _doing work that matters_ to be a special privilege, and that you should be happy and thankful for meaningless work instead. The corporate world is practically anti-capitalist and anti-real.
If anything, that corporate world fulfills the popular perception of art - impractical, pointless gesturing and posing - rather than what real art intends to do, which is to gain a deeper understanding of the real world and show it to others. Art critics tend to hate it when an artist explains how art is made, preferring an explanation of magical genius; but that's their problem, not art's problem.
AI-assisted programming is like working in the manner of Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst. For them, having the idea is the work; they delegate the actual making of the piece entirely to assistants.
Perhaps the extreme end of this is Yoko Ono, who actually released a book of prompts as artwork, things for the audience to do and respond emotionally to. Ex.: "Hide and Seek: Hide until everyone goes home. Hide until everyone forgets you. Hide until everyone dies."
Anyways, whatever you may think of their work or perceived lack thereof, these people are unbelievably rich and the toast of the art world. Just sayin.