The difference in the replies to this comment are striking.
One is a relatively complicated workflow producing 3D assets, the other is "just give pictures to chatgpt and tell it what you want".
The difference in the replies to this comment are striking.
One is a relatively complicated workflow producing 3D assets, the other is "just give pictures to chatgpt and tell it what you want".
It’s not different . One case you chose tiles , you take a picture of your bathroom , and give it a rough sized of tile + room and it will Give you visual check . Second option if you want it also to calculate materials . This is a 3d path . First one can be done by just chat , another one is coding agent .
And neither shows the outcome as to illustrate/support their point, which is phenomenally ironic considering the context..