Here are the things I would love to see:
- supported tooling (e.g. built in browser)
- interaction type ( chat ui, terminal, booth)
- context size added (how large is the additional context so that the agent knows the ADE)
- extensibility (plugins possible)
- completely free, paid possible
- range of harness support (some only support claude and codex)
- installation type (own server + n clients, only clients and properitary server)
- connectivity support of multiple machines (tailscale, SSH, wireguard, proprietary)
- age of project, commit count, PR count
- multiselect of possible platforms (e.g. windows + android)
I guess that's all that is broadly comparable without going into too much detail.
Why a bit of a stretch? They are compared on four aspects (platforms, price, GH stars, open-source). Any more I can add?
Glad you ask and I respect that.
Here are the things I would love to see: - supported tooling (e.g. built in browser) - interaction type ( chat ui, terminal, booth) - context size added (how large is the additional context so that the agent knows the ADE) - extensibility (plugins possible) - completely free, paid possible - range of harness support (some only support claude and codex) - installation type (own server + n clients, only clients and properitary server) - connectivity support of multiple machines (tailscale, SSH, wireguard, proprietary) - age of project, commit count, PR count - multiselect of possible platforms (e.g. windows + android)
I guess that's all that is broadly comparable without going into too much detail.
Thanks for your interest!
Oh and one last one: is the client headless possible or is a GUI necessary.