This whole article is true and to the point but... reality is: most people still don't build their own setups: work, home - most of them follow a sh*tty software or decorate with Ikea. I think this applies only to a small group of users how will be willing to go extra mile and prompt their ideal interface for whatever they need to do.
The realization that "normal" people don't care and will never care was the saddest for me. There are so few people who care. We're essentially irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. We have no leverage.
When I was younger and I heard the saying along the lines of "struggling against the indifference of the universe" I didn't realize at the time it included people too.
Yeah. The indifference of the universe is perfectly manageable. It's the indifference of people that broke me... I'm starting to question every principle I've ever had.
This may sound misanthropic of me, but it has helped immensely for me to view all of humanity as insignificant. Maybe even an anomaly as far as the scale of the universe, or at least an extreme rarity, capable of building societies and machines with more power and influence than our brains and bodies ever evolved to handle.
Perhaps many of us are indifferent because that is our default, and there is no reason we were "meant to" survive this long. If the universe's age scaled down was the length of a human lifetime, we almost went extinct the day before yesterday[1].
Beyond at least that moment, we are very lucky to still be around. There is nothing about us that is special against the vast indifference of the universe. While we may feel special ourselves, against our own atomic understanding of our surroundings, we are not, and that gap could very well be a primary source of our suffering.
That said, it does not stop me from enjoying my time here in this beautiful place and, as Camus put it, raging against the absurdity.
1: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/human-ancestors-n...
Life is complex. You probably don't optimize your life in a way that some other person would be shocked you're not doing.
And they probably optimize their life in a way that's invisible to you.
Different people care about different things (beyond near term well being). We have no ability to be deeply involved in million different topics, but most of us care about several. And random couple of people may have no intersection and could symmetrically see each other as a "useless normie".
That's, uhm, normal and why groups form by interests, from cooking to hiking to reading to hackerspaces to rocketry. I see it as neither bad nor sad. My 2c.
I understand that, I just don't like it.
Computers are world changing technology, magical runes we can bend to our will. I wanted people to care, to fully harness the power of these machines. But virtually nobody cares.
That wouldn't be a problem if this just came down to individual choice, but it doesn't. The fact they don't care has enormous impact on us who do care.
Because they don't care, we are a minority and therefore have no economic leverage. One day the big corporations will make computers that only they control. They will lock us all out. Nobody really cares, people will keep buying the locked down computers and will even defend it as a security feature as though the lockdown was for their own benefit. They could have been lords of their own digital domain, but it turns out they enjoy living as serfs in the digital fiefdoms of trillion dollar corporations.
We also can't have privacy and anonymity because of this. For anonymity to work, we need a massive anonymity set. We need lots of people using things like Tor, ideally most people if not all people. This is so that people can't tell us apart, but also so that they can't just blanket ban Tor traffic without serious economic consequences. But nobody cares, people are just fine with being spied on, so they don't use it and it weakens privacy for us who do care as well.
It's so sad, and I'm starting to actually blame these people for the sad state of things. I look at the trillionaire technocrats building this dystopian world and taking advantage of them, and I start to wonder if they were right to do so. People could have stopped this, if only they cared. They didn't... And therefore they deserve it.
How about this framing: no one person can care about everything but it's important that everyone care about something.
You pushing back on computing makes the digital world a little better for the Ikea designer who doesn't see the magic and just wants to make figure out if the pizza place is still open. In turn, that designer makes sure there's a decent baseline for the design of your home, even when you don't want to think about it. Together, you both make room for the urban planner or chef or nurse, even if you don't think much about transit or gastronomy or healthcare....
There is a mental load budget and when it runs out, people experience decision fatigue ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_fatigue ).
When that is exhausted, people are more likely to take the simple decisions without thought.
Not having to make those decisions is a privilege. Not having to worry about food prices is one such example. Not having to worry about the healthiness or preparation of the food is another.
For many people, they're fighting with the lowest levels of their needs ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs ) that the higher ones don't get much attention.
Even when one does have all the needs fulfilled and able to make decisions about things at the "self actualization - achieving potential and purpose" level, there are so many things out there that one can't make everything a personal utopia (even if they had all the resources to do so).
I'm ok with having an Ikea bed and shelving because I lack the skills and my financial priorities aren't in that direction to customize it myself. I'd love to have the perfect shelves for my game room... but Kallax is ok.
And while I've got the perfect computer setup for the things that I do... my kitchen is a mess that lets me cook the basic food things that I do. To a chef, my kitchen is dystopian. To a carpenter, my shelves are a corporate blandness. To me, their computers and digital workflows are poorly organized.
Not everyone has the capability to understand the nuances of digital security and make choices that improve (or at least don't make it worse) situation.
I can't care about all those things.
What can be done is try to contribute to a "raising tide that lifts all boats" and helps everyone more easily achieve their needs and allow others to be able to meet their potential so they can care about those things without being overwhelmed.
The minority of the population isn't "people who care about digital security" - it's "people who are able to act on realizing their potential." To say that the people who are still working on achieving their safety and physiological needs of housing and health and food and water don't "deserve it" because "if only they cared" are to blame for the world taking advantage of them and responsible for the sad state of things.
People need to be able to not worry about where their next meal comes from before they can be worried about using Tor for everything (or ensuring that people are eating healthy as a chef, or are living in houses that meet their needs as a carpenter).
What exactly are you sad about? You're only just realizing highly technical knowledge makes your opinions a minority?
DUH.
Guess what? That same knowledge gives you agency. With LLMs now, even more so. Want something? Build it (or have claude build it)
Why are you being a defeatist over something you can't control that was always the case? Nothing has changed.
I seriously encounter this hand-wringing on HN. You are pointing out a real problem in the world. A problem that, if not solved, will keep most of the people in the world helpless and at the mercy of governments, billionaires and the platforms they control.
But I don’t like to just bitch. I like to build. So then I show the free and battle tested software I built lovingly over a decade, that solves exactly this, and that I use in my own companies, but also give away for free
https://github.com/Qbix/Platform
What more can I do? I’m just some guy in Brooklyn, who never got funded by VCs (except Balaji’s fund) but persisted for over a decade and published nearly everything as open source for the benefit of others who might know how to deploy it. I keep sharing better and better versions over the years.
What initially surprised me over the years is that the result when I share all this for free on HN is… I get downvoted by other HNers who vehemently hate someone “self promoting” a solution to this very problem. They donmt just “not care”, they care very much that others on HN should not be exposed to such free and open source solutions
Having faced the same problem (of people not running their own servers), I went ahead and built an all-in-one server that you can use to create binaries, copy them, manage public web files like in redbean, as well as php files to run inside the server, then distribute those too. Took me months of iteration with Claude. When I posted it on HN got… 3 upvotes.
Then it was resurrected and reposted by the mods, got 40 upvotes, lots of snark about me having dared to use AI to build it, and “TL;DR” comments, and then… the post resurrected and reposted by the HN moderators themselves was… flagged:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49749789
In the days since, I have improved the server a lot and v2 even lets regular PHP script kiddies build a Jack-Dorsey-style app on iOS and Android. Many people on HN will immediately have a reaction: “why PHP, it’s so old”. So I updated the github to answer that:
https://github.com/Qbix/webserver
Again, this is MIT licensed, and open source. On Reddit, the situation was even worse. Lots of upvotes at first, then anyone saying nice things about it got heavily downvoted and various trolls started posting snarky comments. Oh well, at least it attracted 150 stars and some people are actually forking it and using it.
But let’s be real, not everyone wants to run a webserver. That’s why we had “commodity hosting” in the past. But how to make it so that people can “just use” software they can trust, without anyone being able to tamper with it? In 2017, I got enamored with Blockchain for that reason. I saw tens ofnthousands of people running nodes, and letting normies “just post” transactions. I saw a way that high-calue transactions and balances could be protected. I launched Intercoin Inc, raised half a million dollars (and more since), built the software, deployed it on 7+ EVM blockchains, and made it freely accessibls:
https://intercoin.org/applications:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1733567/000173356718...
Unlike most projects in 2018, we treated the fundraise like a security, and tried to do everything by the book. But, just sharing anything with the word “blockchain” in it should earn me the wrath and downvotes of a certain very active subset of HN. I feel like they almost see the word “blockchain” and insta downvote. Maybe these mechanisms are not even human? Who knows. It cost a lot of money to get right at the time, and released as free and open source. This is Hacker News. One would think they’d celebrate this, let others discover it and use it, even if they themselves don’t like web3. <— (there, I put that “keyword” in there, watch what happen to this comment now). But no.
But blockchain was expensive, slow, and couldn’t hold secrets. And that brings me to… my solution in 2026, which I spent over a year designing and building with AI:
https://safebots.ai/safebox.html
For now HN is split between AI fans and AI lamenters (I saw this arc in web3 too). So this should get a mixed reaction. Even though Safebox isn’t even only for AI. It’s a new security primitive, like blockchain itself was.
The key is this: normies don’t have to run it. You can run it, by cloning an EC2 instance, getting clients, and autonomously earning in safebux, which you can cash out on the… blockchains. Oh am I going to be downvoted now. There is nothing to configure, manage, etc. It is like running your own “commodity hosting”, except you never get to access client data, and you get paid through the decentralized system automatically, and clients get security, failover, etc.
There is much more to this, and soon you’ll hear more about it. But I expect to find - not just people “not caring” - but violent opposition from a very vocal and activist subset for some reason. I mean, I build it, refine it for a decade and give it away for free, for others to serve each other and make money. If you don’t want to, that’s fine, my company will run most of the servers (like Matt Mullenweg’s Wordpress.com did). Or you will be able to run some too, by just cloning an EC2 in your account on AWS, GCP, Azure, OCI, etc.
Once again, it’s not “most of the people out there”. Watch what happens right here on HN.
PS: Safebots + Safebox + Safebux is coming out in a couple months. Until then, I have released Safecloud for encrypted and decentralized storage, absolutely for free, and a alightly technical person can run a backend (Jet). And literally anyone can contribute storage and earn safebux by simply opening a tab and keeping it open. Or don’t earn safebux - the default is absolutely free, for everyone. Use it for some stakeholders or users of your own websites to contribute redundant storage. Or don’t. But at least maybe upvote to let others discover it? Anyway. Here are the links:
https://safebots.github.io/Safecloud/
Academic writeup: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09870
And initial coverage by security magazines:
https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/06/19/safecloud-browser...
We're not just bitching. I've contributed to free and open source projects. I've reverse engineered my laptop and released Linux free software. I'm investing in local inference computers. I've even created my own programming language.
We're doing what we can. The point is it's not enough. One day they will lock us out either way.
The whole point is we can't create an open source computer fab. They cost billions of dollars. It's just not happening. We can make free software at home, but we can't make free computers in our garages. Unless we figure out a way to do this, it's pointless. The chip manufacturers will be the ones responsible for the end of our freedom.
FPGAs -at the cost of going back to 90s hardware performance- actually grant us the ability to make free computers in our garage. I’ve been using LLMs to design CPUs and SoCs and had decent success, actually. You’re still trusting Vivado, I guess, but there is work being done in open toolchains.
Running at 200Mhz rather than 4GHz though is hard to accept for most people, even though retro OSes make the experience quite smooth overall.
I’d argue stuff like the various bootrom exploits for Apple SoCs and similar, used for jailbreaking, is the other side of this. And that one gets you open computing at a much higher perf, although not necessarily malleable, and is not going to be a long term viable strategy.