[flagged]
So in your mind there’s absolutely no subtextual message here in choosing wolves. It would have meant exactly the same thing if he’d chosen raccoons, or pigeons, or deer, or rabbits?
Because, in the context he is describing, humans hunt and kill the wolves:
>> There's a reason why the last known wolf in Denmark didn't just wander off, but was shot dead in 1813.
>> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them.
Yeah, but then in the very next sentence, he says what you do with humans. He's explicit about it, so we don't have to guess.
> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.
So no, he's not talking about hunting and killing the humans.
idk, maybe the "you shoot them" part?? FFS did no one learn anything about the crucial role of dehumanization in the rise of the Nazis?
So in your mind there’s absolutely no subtextual message here in choosing wolves. It would have meant exactly the same thing if he’d chosen raccoons, or pigeons, or deer, or rabbits?
Because, in the context he is describing, humans hunt and kill the wolves:
>> There's a reason why the last known wolf in Denmark didn't just wander off, but was shot dead in 1813.
>> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them.
Yeah, but then in the very next sentence, he says what you do with humans. He's explicit about it, so we don't have to guess.
> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.
So no, he's not talking about hunting and killing the humans.
idk, maybe the "you shoot them" part?? FFS did no one learn anything about the crucial role of dehumanization in the rise of the Nazis?