It's all part of a carefully crafted march to an IPO that's going to determine whether the people involved in Anthropic catapult to a new level of wealth... or not.
It's all part of a carefully crafted march to an IPO that's going to determine whether the people involved in Anthropic catapult to a new level of wealth... or not.
People involved in Anthropic will be catapulted to a new level of wealth for sure. The problem is the regular Joe investing his savings in Anthropic, thinking he is going to be catapulted as well ...
There's still time for them to be left holding the bag, much like OpenAI has been forced to for the time being. Even if people here believe that the economic activity in this sector doesn't represent a bubble, at least they can see the warning signs as a result of trade and literal war, 10-year yields are back over 5%, oil and diesel are going sky high, and there's no quick fix to any of it even if our leaders were willing and capable of trying.
So personally I understand why Anthropic is only concerned about finding bag holders rather than ethics, decency, legality, responsibility, humanity, or a modicum of thought beyond their own selfish desires.
> trade and literal war, 10-year yields are back over 5%, oil and diesel are going sky high
So I should short atoms and go long on bits right? Everything you listed is horrible for hardtech, but has minimal impact on software.
Reminds me of the spacex IPO. HN claimed it would crash, but I noticed that nobody on HN used prediction markets to short it the day before IPO. Meanwhile I bought in and sold some after the 20% pop. I should start a reverse-HN fund
HN isn't a person, and has nothing like a single opinion on anything. It's a bunch of quarrelsome people. If you think that you gleaned a single claim from "HN" then I'd say that's your problem right there.
oh he'll be catapulted all right.