>Every major statement I've seen come out of the math community on this matter reads as well thought-through, humble, reasoned, and deeply human.
Can't disagree with "deeply human", but I wouldn't always use it in a positive sense:
https://proofsandprompts.com/2026/09/10/open-letter-about-th...
>Participation in an event so closely associated with Anthropic and OpenAI could plausibly negatively impact the future reputations of participants
What do you believe doesn’t reflect positively on the authors of that open letter? It raises valid concerns, and the statement you quoted is a factual observation.
It reads as a transparent attempt at intimidation to me.
Wow, that's disgusting.