Even the $20 tier of ChatGPT has privacy settings that forbid using the user's data to be used for training. The question is, whether this setting is respected.
Even the $20 tier of ChatGPT has privacy settings that forbid using the user's data to be used for training. The question is, whether this setting is respected.
I assume the data is laundered into a format that qualifies as no longer being the "user's" data, then trained on.
the existence of the triplets NSA/CIA/GRU implies an imperitive no.
that is a whole different thing though... AI labs are not government intelligence agencies
minus two or three things, corporate data is classified as public/goverment data. we just saw something about earmarking domain last month? two being imminent domain. three being natsec.
risk of prescient theory is more important than dismissive ablation.
edit: to wit, facebook google and anything else not e2e.
it's not like the ai is homomorphic.
oh, haha. another point to make: what do you think they've been building out for 25 years with fusion centers and maryland/utah?
"government intelligence agencies" ARE 'AI'.