Why do you have to use your statistics, when you can use arguments addressing the problems in the articles?
Sounds lot like you are using appeal to authority.
Why do you have to use your statistics, when you can use arguments addressing the problems in the articles?
Sounds lot like you are using appeal to authority.
I would say the appeal to authority was in the post I responded to: "the author is a physicist". I was simply pointing out that "physicist" is a broad term, and the fact that he has that job title doesn't automatically make him knowledgeable about the specific subject area in question.
As for the actual article, I think it's too vague to even be able to criticize anything specific. It's words strung together, but no actual testable model that I can see. (One key red flag: the page where he says the "mathematical details" are--does not even have a single equation.)