Attempts to tackle why in science are actually, underneath, just a how-it-really-happens, or what-happens answers.
No scientist can explain the why, and most can't even explain the how (Heisenberg uncertainty, for one accessible example).
Attempts to tackle why in science are actually, underneath, just a how-it-really-happens, or what-happens answers.
No scientist can explain the why, and most can't even explain the how (Heisenberg uncertainty, for one accessible example).
The fact that i am being downvoted on my previous comment means i am on to sth. Truth maybe?
I didn't really understand what you wrote in your comment above. Re-phrase a bit maybe?
Sure. In the first comment: science can only explain what happens, and even that, with no certainty.
In the second comment: my first comment was getting downvoted heavily by the pseudo-quacks whose religion is science.