We know for certain. The involvement of Irregular in the other cases was never a secret, they were quite open about what they were working on and the results of the evaluations were being published on their website.
We know for certain. The involvement of Irregular in the other cases was never a secret, they were quite open about what they were working on and the results of the evaluations were being published on their website.
Their disclosures in other cases is not evidence of non-involvement in this case.
Can you explain in what way you think they could possibly have been covertly involved?