There have been news stories where individual OpenAI users have been investigated based on their prompts. If OpenAI can point the police to specific users of their software, they can certainly point them to whichever of their own employees are involved in a crime. AI is just a tool, and the person prompting it is the one responsible for the outcome. No dilution there.
What is its one their "under development" models who escaped it's training, because it wasn't tuned properly?
That’s corporate negligence. The executives are liable unless there is evidence of malfeasance by one of the employees.
Is that different than cattle escaping and damaging property?
I believe the rancher is at fault.
The you treat it like an employee you started a fire that got out of control and damaged property. Was the employee supposed to start a fire, is the company liable ect.
Counter argument being that this seems to indicate you can do whatever as long as you're innovating?
Isn’t that the tech industry motto?
And the motto of every neoliberal governments where being accused of Luddism is political death.
[dead]
If you were hit by a Tesla in self driving mode, do you think your insurance company is going to go after the driver of the car?
Employees acting on behalf of the company aren't going to be held personally liable.
Then who is?
If something warrants a prison sentence, but for some reason it was such an employee that performed the act, does this mean nobody can be arrested?
why?