So we make a law that the CEO is responsible for actions of any agent created or operated by anyone in their company. CEOs will get serious about AI security real quick. Honestly we need to do something. There needs to be a single wringable neck.
So we make a law that the CEO is responsible for actions of any agent created or operated by anyone in their company. CEOs will get serious about AI security real quick. Honestly we need to do something. There needs to be a single wringable neck.
You don't need to make a law. Who was prosecuted for dieselgate? You need to enforce existing ones.
I feel ya, but who is we? The legislature would probably take a glance at the stock valuations, apply their limited knowledge of technology and after being lobbied by every tech company with skin come to the opposite conclusion.
> There needs to be a single wringable neck.
Does there? Could be the whole c-suite/board.
I'd settle for any number of necks. Currently, when a corporation fucks something up, breaks the law, or hurts or even kills people, there aren't consequences besides a tiny token fine and a strongly worded letter telling them to not do it again or they'll get another tiny fine and letter, and their CEO might even have to sit down in front of Congress to say a few words and look sad.
Whatever is easiest to legislate and most people agree on, as long as there is at least one wringable neck.
I feel like our legislators would never get this far. They really don’t seem to care, maybe after “their emails get hacked”, but do you find it likely for this to actually pass into law?