I certainly didn't intend to imply that the declaration is against using AI.

My point is just that I feel a little optimistic that the human culture around math ("ideas we disseminate in talks, private discussions and careful writeups, connecting them to the previous ideas of others" and so on, to quote the declaration) is robust even against relatively irresponsible use of AI (i.e., an onslaught of proof-slop).

And I guess we'd better try to be optimistic, because even if the declaration results in some realignment between the community and big AI companies, the models capable of this work are not always going to be exclusively under the control of those aligned parties.

That said, I think the declaration is great and I support it--let's see what comes out of it.

> the models capable of this work are not always going to be exclusively under the control of those aligned parties.

Yes, the trailing edge will catch up quickly.

I wonder how long until P vs NP falls.