> my point is that language encodes not just word semantics but entire ways of thinking

What does this mean? More importantly, why would these "ways of thinking" (what even is a "way of thinking" in this context?)

Also, keep in mind that the training data encompasses a representative sample of world languages.

My best attempt to understand you is that you are supposing that people (or other reasoning agents that manipulate language in order to reason) do pattern matching because there's something inherent to language (as a concept, in the analytical Chomsky sense: a string of symbols chosen from some predefined set, organized according to a grammar, whatever) that causes them to do pattern matching. And furthermore that to do pattern matching is inherently to be biased.

I think that is backwards on the first count (pattern matching is reasoning, and humans have language because we developed it to communicate that reasoning) and absurd on the second count (requires an unreasonable concept of "bias").

Again, I really sincerely honestly am not trying to strawman you here. If you mean something different then I'm afraid it's simply not a concept you'll be able to convey to me.