Pangram says the first 100 words are 100% AI slop.
(Don't shoot the messenger, just trying out Tangram for the first time.)
Pangram is wrong.
The text does not have any of the superfluous words typical for Claude/OpenAI talk.
It is written like an answer to "Explain to me like I am 5", but it contains appropriate information for such a context.
Only towards the end of the article, there are some signs that indicate AI editing, like a too frequent use of the word "simply", e.g.:
> "The one-clock-cycle delay introduced by an RDIMM is not simply a penalty. It results from pipelining the memory interface. "
This would have been better just: "The one-clock-cycle delay introduced by an RDIMM results from pipelining the memory interface."
Overall, it seems that the AI contribution was minimal.
Pangram is wrong.
The text does not have any of the superfluous words typical for Claude/OpenAI talk.
It is written like an answer to "Explain to me like I am 5", but it contains appropriate information for such a context.
Only towards the end of the article, there are some signs that indicate AI editing, like a too frequent use of the word "simply", e.g.:
> "The one-clock-cycle delay introduced by an RDIMM is not simply a penalty. It results from pipelining the memory interface. "
This would have been better just: "The one-clock-cycle delay introduced by an RDIMM results from pipelining the memory interface."
Overall, it seems that the AI contribution was minimal.