People aren't that lazy. The organizations getting hacked by ransomware aren't particularly lazy, they're often pretty productive within their domain. Hospitals, airports, etc.

The actual problem is that computer security is a black hole. If you let it, it will suck in everything and destroy it. Nobody knows what works so you can spend infinite amounts of time and money on it, then still get popped by a teenager in Belarus. Your security team will accept no responsibility for this, there will be no falling on swords or personal liability, and they will just use it to demand even more money in an infinite spiral.

So the average executive looks at this situation and says, OK, something we can put infinity effort into and still suddenly fail at without warning is a total non-starter. What are we obliged to do? How do we show we made an effort?

And that's how you end up with a culture oriented around passing audits. It's not wrong, and it's not lazy. It's just really hard to do better because it's not clear how to set budgets without a concrete goal to aim for.

That’s not been my experience at all when working in DevSecOps.

What actually happens in organisations is they define risks and then sign off what risks they’re willing to accept.

Any business that looks at security as a binary value is running their business wrong. Period.

And yes, people really are that lazy. There are countless studies that have shown just how lazy people are. It’s why shadow IT is a big problem in many orgs. And why consumers are constantly taken advantage of