Comparison was done in the scope of coderabbit AI code review tool, which sadly makes it practically irrelevant.
My personal experience as a software engineer, and a former security researcher who did manual code audit, is that this code review tool has such poor results that it isn't worth the "noise" and friction it causes developers during C/I code review
Yeah I personally don’t understand the point of AI code review tools all that much, as AI is already generating the code as well. All of these AI code review tools create so much noise, yet don’t catch the really important things.
That should be expected based on the scaling laws that we expect; larger models are more intelligent and cost more. Now it's very unfortunately that they don't publish the size of their models.
Comparison was done in the scope of coderabbit AI code review tool, which sadly makes it practically irrelevant.
My personal experience as a software engineer, and a former security researcher who did manual code audit, is that this code review tool has such poor results that it isn't worth the "noise" and friction it causes developers during C/I code review
Yeah I personally don’t understand the point of AI code review tools all that much, as AI is already generating the code as well. All of these AI code review tools create so much noise, yet don’t catch the really important things.
Both OAI and Anthropic seem to have released a model that is slightly better but cost ~2x the previous iteration. Interesting play
Astra and Sol are the same price when you factor in token efficiency
That should be expected based on the scaling laws that we expect; larger models are more intelligent and cost more. Now it's very unfortunately that they don't publish the size of their models.
Interesting comment because it is true that Astra is costlier for the same intelligence tasks as Sol.
But this is not the same for Fable at all.
[dead]
Soon in Airuncode.com