Can I ask what you're hoping the organization does with that money? I'm genuinely interested in understanding what the expected outcome is.
Can I ask what you're hoping the organization does with that money? I'm genuinely interested in understanding what the expected outcome is.
Servers, connection and maintenance costs... That is what they do. Read the manifesto.
> We react by providing a platform and tools for digital self-defense addressing the need of free communication for activists and other individuals
Yes, they select the users. But clearly to exclude services to those they would judge as bad actors!
So you're in it purely for freedom of expression? I can get behind that, but after reading further it doesn't seem like they are about that at all, but rather are extremely selective and it has nothing to do with "bad acting."
> reading further ... extremely selective and it has nothing to do with
What paragraphs inclined you to think that?
> To be hosted on our servers you have to share our principles of anti-fascism, anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, and anti-militarism.
Those stated beliefs are shockingly close to far-leftism. So I'm guessing the same radical exclusionary zeal is also being applied here.
Also, for clarity, I'm not taking those definitions literally, but rather as dog whistles for a very specific group of people (I'm from the Portland, OR area and I'm _very_ familiar with this group that has been terrorizing my poor city).
> very specific group of people
These are Italians. There are all possibilities the spirits are different - unless globalization (of information and communication, "of culture") had merged the two.
Which group of people are you taking it as a dog whistle for?
>I'm not taking those definitions literally
Given that fascism had quite the bloodied history in Italy (see: Mussolini), and we're talking about a group literally based in Italy, why wouldn't you? Is it because you were unaware of said history in Italy and never experienced fascism first-hand, yourself?
Why did you pick one thing on the list and ignore all of the others?
Very probably because he took all the others for granted and thought that only the one he got explicit about was that which some may perceive as odd.
That's a standard anti-gish-gallop tactic.