> Nobody hallucinates or "sees" the object

Prove it.

> If you quiz someone long enough you can get them to acknowledge they don't see anything "in their head" whatever that means.

This is simply false, as numerous people here have demonstrated.

> irrationally annoyed

Yes, irrationality and emotive reaction is evident.

> I suspect because it's unfalsifiable attention seeking

You suspect a lot of things based on no evidence whatsoever.

> some people I've met mention it every chance they get angling at it being some sort of disability

How is being able to see things in one's mind's eye a disability? Ah, but you meant the opposite -- your whole framework is irrational, baseless, intellectually dishonest, bad faith, and indeed quite annoying.

> I get it, you don't see anything...I don't see anything either...nobody does.

Again, it was the claim that people do see things that you were rejecting. You can't keep track of your own argument because it's irrational and devoid of evidence or logic.

I won't respond again.