their point is while the 'group' wins, the rest of the world loses.

localized gains, distributed loss.

as an art enjoyer, i do not feel that having less media written, drawn, or voiced by a computer is a loss.

a computer can never be sad or horny or have taste. it can only make product. i also think artists should be paid living wages with good working conditions.

thank you SAG-AFTRA, WGA, IATSE, AEMI and Teamsters.

> a computer can never be sad or horny or have taste

So far ;-)

There is no moral imperative to help the world reach an optimum. Rather, the world is full of competing interests.