> I know you must not be confusing enshittification and monopoly, so why the attempted switch?
If you can't see how these are related, then we're done here.
> I know you must not be confusing enshittification and monopoly, so why the attempted switch?
If you can't see how these are related, then we're done here.
I guess I can't because in the first place every "enshittified" example you could muster was not contingent on monopoly, at all. You misunderstand what monopoly is, and are working your way backwards from it as the conclusion.
You're ignoring the context of my previous comments and taking a strict definition of monopoly to ignore the arguments put forth. Bad Faith 101.
No, I'm taking the only definition of monopoly, and you're creating new "contexts" whenever it suits you. I addressed your arguments and you have no rebuttal, so this is what you resort to, taking your ball and going home.
> I addressed your arguments
You did not. But you have lots of boot to clean out of your mouth, so I won't bother you any longer.