Am I understanding that the line you're drawing here is that this person's repository is not important or legitimate enough for you to consider it to be "an actual person/project"?
Am I understanding that the line you're drawing here is that this person's repository is not important or legitimate enough for you to consider it to be "an actual person/project"?
I think he saying that, the choice of manufactured repository, might indicate that they have done this on purpose to make precisely the case for regulatory capture.
It seems effective for the purpose in that case.